Gender Differences: Pocket Money Affects Investment Interest with Financial Literacy as a Mediating Variable

Authors

  • Tommy Fedian Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Muara Bungo, Jambi
  • Riza Syaputra Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Tridinanti, Palembang, Sumatera Selatan
  • Ronald N Girsang Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Muara Bungo, Jambi
  • Laula Dwi Martika Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Muara Bungo, Jambi
  • Sri Wineh Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Muara Bungo, Jambi
  • Gita Suliska Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Muara Bungo, Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52333/kompetitif.v14i2.1683

Keywords:

Investment Interest, Pocket Money, Financial Literacy, Gender

Abstract

Investment interest among university students remains relatively low, even though young people have great potential to support the growth of the capital market in Indonesia. This low interest is presumed to be influenced by financial and behavioral factors, such as pocket money and the level of financial literacy, which may differ between males and females. This study aims to analyze the effect of pocket money on students’ investment interest with financial literacy as a mediating variable and to examine the differences in influence based on gender. The research was conducted among students of the Faculty of Economics, Universitas Muara Bungo, involving 247 respondents. A quantitative explanatory approach was employed using the Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis technique with SmartPLS 4.0 software. The findings indicate that pocket money has a significant positive effect on investment interest, and financial literacy partially mediates this relationship. Furthermore, there are differences between male and female students, where males show a stronger direct effect, while females demonstrate a greater mediating role of financial literacy. The limitation of this study lies in its focus on a single university. This research contributes to strengthening financial literacy and developing investment education strategies for students in the fields of economics and finance.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Atkinson, A., & Messy, F. (2012). Measuring financial literacy: Results of the OECD / International Network on Financial Education (INFE) pilot study. OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions.

Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.

Ghozali, I. (2021). Partial Least Squares: Konsep, Teknik, dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.0 untuk Penelitian Empiris. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Gunawan, R. R., & Siregar, T. (2020). Pengaruh uang saku terhadap perilaku investasi mahasiswa. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan, 21(1), 45–58.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

InvestGlass. (2025). Investment behavior trends in digital finance. https://www.investglass.com

Istiadi, E. (2024). Behavioral finance and student investment decision-making. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perilaku Ekonomi, 13(1), 55–68.

Kalista, N. D. (2024). Gender perspective in financial behavior: Case study on young investors. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 12(1), 14–29.

Klapper, L., Lusardi, A., & Van Oudheusden, P. (2013). Financial literacy around the world: Insights from the Standard & Poor's Ratings Services Global Financial Literacy Survey. World Bank.

Luky, R. (2024). Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior in student investment decisions. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 11(2), 112–125.

Lusardi, A. (2011). Americans’ financial capability. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 10(4), 509–525.

Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2011). Financial literacy and retirement planning in the United States. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 10(4), 509–525.

Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44.

Maknickienė, N. (2022). Influence of gender on investment behavior: Literature review. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 23(2), 178–190.

OECD. (2020). OECD/INFE International Survey of Adult Financial Literacy Competencies.

Prasetyo, A. R., et al. (2021). Hubungan uang saku dengan minat investasi mahasiswa. Jurnal Manajemen Keuangan, 9(2), 78–89.

Sari, D. P., & Hadi, S. (2022). Literasi keuangan dan pengaruhnya terhadap minat investasi mahasiswa dari perspektif gender. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 10(3), 102–114.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

van Rooij, M., Lusardi, A., & Alessie, R. (2011). Financial literacy and stock market participation. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2), 449–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.006

Wijaya, S. F., et al. (2019). The role of pocket money in investment interest among youths. Indonesian Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(1), 50–62

Downloads

Published

2025-12-22

How to Cite

Tommy Fedian, Riza Syaputra, Ronald N Girsang, Laula Dwi Martika, Sri Wineh, & Gita Suliska. (2025). Gender Differences: Pocket Money Affects Investment Interest with Financial Literacy as a Mediating Variable. Jurnal Kompetitif, 14(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.52333/kompetitif.v14i2.1683